You need to install Flash Player to play this content.
 Patnaree Chankij's home on
 the outskirts of Bangkok is a cramped, three-room house in which the 
40-year-old widow lives with two of her children, and where she often 
does other people's laundry to make ends meet. At other times she works 
as a casual cleaner in apartments and offices.
As in other houses in Thailand, there are portraits of King Bhumibol Adulyadej on the walls. Patnaree considers herself a loyal citizen, and says she has never said anything negative about the royal family.
But earlier this month she was detained by the police and charged with lese majeste, insulting the monarchy, one of the most serious charges in the Thai criminal code. It carries a penalty of three to 15 years on each count and its use has escalated after the military coup two years ago.
More than 60 people have been charged since then. Most of the cases are now heard in military courts, which restrict the rights of defence. Often they are heard in secret, with journalists finding out about them weeks later, if at all.
Sentences are harsh. Last year a mother of two was given a sentence of 56 years for comments she made on Facebook - later halved after she pleaded guilty.
So what did Patnaree do to get charged? According to
 her lawyer, the only evidence the police have produced is an exchange 
on Facebook between her and a political activist, in which she responded
 to comments the police say are defamatory with the Thai word "ja", 
which translates as "I see", or "ok".
The police say she should have condemned the comments.
Patnaree
 does not believe she has been charged over anything she said or wrote. 
She believes it is because of her son, Sirawith (which translates as 
New) Seritiwat.
He
 is a political science student at Thammasat University, but over the 
past two years he has also emerged as the best-known face of student 
dissent against military rule.
Right after the coup, as part of 
two groups called Resistant Citizens and Thai Student Centre for 
Democracy, he joined protests against the new government, using symbols 
like the three-fingered salute from the film series Hunger Games and 
reading George Orwell's classic novel 1984 in public.
Last year 
they held a mock election outside a central Bangkok arts centre. Then 
they organised a protest train ride to a controversial royal-themed 
park, which had been built by the army, allegedly through some corrupt 
contracts.
The groups now call themselves the New Democracy Movement.
Although their demonstrations have been small, these
 activists are the only group openly challenging the military in 
Thailand. The so-called "red shirt" mass movement, which backed the 
government ousted by the coup, has largely been silent.
The army 
has responded by detaining the students and putting them through what it
 calls "attitude adjustment", where they are pressured to change their 
views.
More recently, the army has hardened its stance, filing 
criminal charges against some of the activists. Sirawith has been 
detained several times and charged twice, although he has not yet been 
tried.
Now the military government is preparing to introduce a new
 constitution which will enshrine military dominance of politics for 
many more years. It would allow elections to take place as early as next
 year, but the charter weakens the power of elected governments and 
gives more power to a military-appointed senate, and to the conservative
 higher courts.
The junta has promised a referendum on the 
constitution on 7 August, but with supporters of the ousted government 
likely to be hostile to a charter which would in all likelihood block 
their party from returning to power, the military has banned all 
campaigning against it. 
Those who try to sway public opinion are threatened with 10-year prison sentences.
At
 the same time, thousands of government officials are being trained to 
go out and inform the public about the constitution, and to persuade 
them to vote.
In that way the military hopes to win the August 
vote. Losing it would be a serious blow to the credibility of a 
government which has always insisted that most Thai people support its 
plans to restructure the country. It is not a result the military will 
leave to chance.
Activists like Sirawith Seritiwat are a threat to
 that strategy, and in the weeks leading up to the referendum the 
soldiers are sure to redouble their efforts to stifle dissenting voices.
No comments:
Post a Comment